tin wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

fuiyooo... ini jenama mahal nih...

kaya, kaya, kayaaaa....

he3, tinggi jugak taste hang, pernah beli bagi kat awek ker?

tin wrote:

marc_zman wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

pagi yg membusankan.. kasik panas skit
ekekekekeeee

sapa nih? adik lu ka marc?

jazim will going to be extremely pleased...

weh abe tin.. wa sudah tau sapa ini awek
nama dia neelofa
diorang kata minah ni juara dewi remaja


[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

nampak gaya cam menepati spesifikasi brader DF kita jer.. ekekekeee

venez wrote:

tin wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

fuiyooo... ini jenama mahal nih...

kaya, kaya, kayaaaa....

he3, tinggi jugak taste hang, pernah beli bagi kat awek ker?

apa boss tanya camtu.? malu laaa abe tin
dia mana ada beli tuk awek
dia beli tuk pakai sendiri laaaaa











laaaaarrrrriiiiikkkkk... adush dush dush.. semput wehhh

venez wrote:

he3, tinggi jugak taste hang, pernah beli bagi kat awek ker?

tara bos. kena blajar jugaa...

jgn nak tunggu dah kawen baru mau blajar...

marc_zman wrote:

nampak gaya cam menepati spesifikasi brader DF kita jer.. ekekekeee

begitu juga pada pemikiran hamba...

tenteng wrote:

woiittt...pagi2 dah skodeng org... nanti sorg2 dapat ketimbir baru padan...

Diorang bukan skodeng, tapi tolong Jabatan Kebajikan Masyarakat dan program Bersamamu TV3 cari awek2 yang x mampu beli pakaian untuk diberi bantuan pakaian...Ahakz!

tin wrote:

marc_zman wrote:

nampak gaya cam menepati spesifikasi brader DF kita jer.. ekekekeee

begitu juga pada pemikiran hamba...

Size does matter pada brader DF kita

marc_zman wrote:

venez wrote:

tin wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

fuiyooo... ini jenama mahal nih...

kaya, kaya, kayaaaa....

he3, tinggi jugak taste hang, pernah beli bagi kat awek ker?

apa boss tanya camtu.? malu laaa abe tin
dia mana ada beli tuk awek
dia beli tuk pakai sendiri laaaaa











laaaaarrrrriiiiikkkkk... adush dush dush.. semput wehhh

muhahahaha....

marc_zman wrote:

venez wrote:

tin wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

fuiyooo... ini jenama mahal nih...

kaya, kaya, kayaaaa....

he3, tinggi jugak taste hang, pernah beli bagi kat awek ker?

apa boss tanya camtu.? malu laaa abe tin
dia mana ada beli tuk awek
dia beli tuk pakai sendiri laaaaa











laaaaarrrrriiiiikkkkk... adush dush dush.. semput wehhh

cisss.....

tin wrote:

marc_zman wrote:

venez wrote:

tin wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

fuiyooo... ini jenama mahal nih...

kaya, kaya, kayaaaa....

he3, tinggi jugak taste hang, pernah beli bagi kat awek ker?

apa boss tanya camtu.? malu laaa abe tin
dia mana ada beli tuk awek
dia beli tuk pakai sendiri laaaaa











laaaaarrrrriiiiikkkkk... adush dush dush.. semput wehhh

cisss.....

ekekekeee.. jangan marah abe tin

fyi.. wa teringat terus scene citer Shrek 2
scene pinochio kantoi pakai thong pompuan.. ekekekeee

ntah2 tin pki thong nih? huk3

venez wrote:

ntah2 tin pki thong nih? huk3

peminat thong jer yg rajin amik gambo tyhong org lain, kan bols ven kan, kan, kaannnn...

tin wrote:

venez wrote:

ntah2 tin pki thong nih? huk3

peminat thong jer yg rajin amik gambo tyhong org lain, kan bols ven kan, kan, kaannnn...

erkk, wa tempek gambar jerk...

marc_zman wrote:

tin wrote:

marc_zman wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

pagi yg membusankan.. kasik panas skit
ekekekekeeee

sapa nih? adik lu ka marc?

jazim will going to be extremely pleased...

weh abe tin.. wa sudah tau sapa ini awek
nama dia neelofa
diorang kata minah ni juara dewi remaja


[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

nampak gaya cam menepati spesifikasi brader DF kita jer.. ekekekeee

apa nko kata, menepati citara akuu... huh.... jauh panggang dari bara, cuba nko tgk dier punyer flight deck tuuu, mana da skiejump, pakai catapult tuuu... landai....

bro DF, sila rujuk gambo last tuh.

walopon dia punya ski jump is regrettably lower in inclination, it is however still within the limits prescribed by EN 13402-3 standard.

no no no....... u r wrong... very wrong..... no those standard cannot be use....
if u refer to DEWAFROST standard, the ski jump must be, repeat must be, 25% from the flight deck, the best is 45% wih support, but if u can get 45% without support, u r in heaven.... hehehehehehe

dewafrost wrote:

no no no....... u r wrong... very wrong..... no those standard cannot be use....
if u refer to DEWAFROST standard, the ski jump must be, repeat must be, 25% from the flight deck, the best is 45% wih support, but if u can get 45% without support, u r in heaven.... hehehehehehe

there were neither standard nor measurement stipulated before this. logic dictates that in absence of such, the closest available standard can be used. furthermore, the inclination percentage given is too vague to work on. visual inspection has confirmed that the ramp is indeed inclined more that 25 % prescribed but admittedly lower than the ideal 45%.

perggg, bump pun ada special criteria...

Cerah mata wa tengok gambor2 dewi remaja tu

tin wrote:

dewafrost wrote:

no no no....... u r wrong... very wrong..... no those standard cannot be use....
if u refer to DEWAFROST standard, the ski jump must be, repeat must be, 25% from the flight deck, the best is 45% wih support, but if u can get 45% without support, u r in heaven.... hehehehehehe

there were neither standard nor measurement stipulated before this. logic dictates that in absence of such, the closest available standard can be used. furthermore, the inclination percentage given is too vague to work on. visual inspection has confirmed that the ramp is indeed inclined more that 25 % prescribed but admittedly lower than the ideal 45%.

Silap tu abe tin, DF nak size besar la...
Pastu body kena lenting2 skit...
Kalo takat size normal, jauh la dia nak...
ekekeke

tin wrote:

dewafrost wrote:

no no no....... u r wrong... very wrong..... no those standard cannot be use....
if u refer to DEWAFROST standard, the ski jump must be, repeat must be, 25% from the flight deck, the best is 45% wih support, but if u can get 45% without support, u r in heaven.... hehehehehehe

there were neither standard nor measurement stipulated before this. logic dictates that in absence of such, the closest available standard can be used. furthermore, the inclination percentage given is too vague to work on. visual inspection has confirmed that the ramp is indeed inclined more that 25 % prescribed but admittedly lower than the ideal 45%.

oooo... getting technical, are we?

carilah yg sedap mata memandang dan especially sejuk rasa di hati (beriman)

sampai bila la mata tu sedap memandang? ramp inclination pon bukan buleh maintain lama2....

observateur wrote:

oooo... getting technical, are we?

carilah yg sedap mata memandang dan especially sejuk rasa di hati (beriman)

sampai bila la mata tu sedap memandang? ramp inclination pon bukan buleh maintain lama2....

well, sometimes you have to talk in a language DF understands.

bab ramp inclination tuh leh maintain dgn proper internal or external support but supplicity tu yg susah mau maintain tuh heheheh...

observateur wrote:

tin wrote:

dewafrost wrote:

no no no....... u r wrong... very wrong..... no those standard cannot be use....
if u refer to DEWAFROST standard, the ski jump must be, repeat must be, 25% from the flight deck, the best is 45% wih support, but if u can get 45% without support, u r in heaven.... hehehehehehe

there were neither standard nor measurement stipulated before this. logic dictates that in absence of such, the closest available standard can be used. furthermore, the inclination percentage given is too vague to work on. visual inspection has confirmed that the ramp is indeed inclined more that 25 % prescribed but admittedly lower than the ideal 45%.

oooo... getting technical, are we?

carilah yg sedap mata memandang dan especially sejuk rasa di hati (beriman)

sampai bila la mata tu sedap memandang? ramp inclination pon bukan buleh maintain lama2....

dan kena ingat, waktu dah tawen mesti ada gaduh2 punya, tak besar kecik...so carilah yang boleh ambik hati kita, atau kita senang ambik hati balik

mumuchi wrote:

observateur wrote:

tin wrote:

dewafrost wrote:

no no no....... u r wrong... very wrong..... no those standard cannot be use....
if u refer to DEWAFROST standard, the ski jump must be, repeat must be, 25% from the flight deck, the best is 45% wih support, but if u can get 45% without support, u r in heaven.... hehehehehehe

there were neither standard nor measurement stipulated before this. logic dictates that in absence of such, the closest available standard can be used. furthermore, the inclination percentage given is too vague to work on. visual inspection has confirmed that the ramp is indeed inclined more that 25 % prescribed but admittedly lower than the ideal 45%.

oooo... getting technical, are we?

carilah yg sedap mata memandang dan especially sejuk rasa di hati (beriman)

sampai bila la mata tu sedap memandang? ramp inclination pon bukan buleh maintain lama2....

dan kena ingat, waktu dah tawen mesti ada gaduh2 punya, tak besar kecik...so carilah yang boleh ambik hati kita, atau kita senang ambik hati balik

exactly boyo!

observateur wrote:

exactly boyo!

boyo ker boyot ehehehe...

tin, yuna xnak ker?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]